Published in Reviews

Samsung’s third-generation SM961 256GB NVMe SSD reviewed

by on05 February 2017

Index

Samsung SM961 256GB packaging and specifications

For its third-generation M.2 SSD lineup, Samsung has introduced two OEM drives – SM961 and PM961 – and two consumer focused drives – 960 Pro and 960 Evo. All four of these solid state disks feature the new Polaris controller and are based on the NVMe protocol running on a PCI-E 3.0 x4 interface. The main difference is that the OEM series uses 48-layer MLC NAND, while the consumer series uses 48-layer TLC and MLC V-NAND, depending on the particular unit.

samsung sm961 256gb product packaging

This particular drive was bought from FlexxMemory in the UK and was received in a small plastic casing with just the bare drive for a total price of $147.77, though it is now available for $163.96. By contrast, the consumer-oriented Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 drive was announced back in October but is currently listed as a pre-order on most sites for $129.99. That drive is expected to become available within the next six weeks.

samsung sm961 256gb m.2 nvme ssd front
samsung sm961 256gb m.2 nvme ssd rear

While the US version of Samsung’s website does not include a data sheet on its SM961 or PM961 series OEM drives, it does list their basic product specifications, including random speeds, sequential speeds and IOPS throughput, along with the form factor and interface type.

In April 2015, Samsung’s preceding SM951 256GB drive was capable of delivering up to 2,150MB/s sequential reads and 1,200MB/s sequential writes, along with up to 300,000 random read IOPS and 100,000 random write IOPS. The company’s SM961 256GB model now capable of delivering up to 3,100MB/s sequential reads and 1,400MB/s sequential writes, along with 330,000 of random read IOPS and 280,000 random write IOPS. This is about a 44 percent improvement in sequential reads, 17 percent in sequential writes, 10 percent in random read IOPS, and 280 percent in random write IOPS.

64-layer MLC V-NAND and Polaris controller

Samsung's 256Gbit 48-layer MLC NAND flash is dense enough that all capacity options in the SM961 series come in a single-sided 2280 M.2 form factor, including the 1TB model. The previous SM951 shipped with Samsung’s planar MLC NAND flash, which gave it a slight endurance disadvantage in comparison to the retail 950 Pro drives with 32-layer V-NAND. Meanwhile, the newer consumer-oriented 960 PRO ships with 48-layer MLC V-NAND, while the more equivalent 960 EVO ships with 48-layer TLC V-NAND.

This particular 256GB SM961 drive features an eight-channel Samsung Polaris (S4LP077X01-8030) controller and a 1GB LPDDR3 cache. Power consumption is rated at 5.9 watts in operational mode and 2.5mW in devSlp low-power standby mode. While there is no endurance rating (TBW) for this drive, it includes a 3-year warranty for OEMs, versus the 5-year warranty found on the 960 Pro and 960 Evo lineups.

SM961 256GB vs 960 EVO 250GB

While the choice of NAND density may be an important selling point for some folks, the feature differences between Samsung’s OEM and consumer drives are also quite an interesting mix. One tradeoff between the OEM SM961 and the consumer 960 EVO is that the former features end-to-end data protection during power loss while foregoing a ~20,000 IOPS drop in random write performance. Meanwhile, the latter supports AES 256-bit user data encryption, TCG/Opal, and dynamic thermal throttling management at the sacrifice of using less durable TLC NAND.

samsung third generation m.2 nvme ssd model chart 700px

Samsung third-generation M.2 NVMe SSD model chart (Larger image here)

All four of Samsung’s latest Polaris-based M.2 drives also boast a mean time between failure (MTBF) rate of 1.5 million hours, making them sufficient for high-demand workloads. While the SM961 256GB OEM drive does not include a total bytes written (TBW) rating, the most similar consumer model on the chart would be the 256GB 960 Evo, which is rated at three years, or 100TBW.


Last modified on 06 February 2017
Rate this item
(0 votes)