Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 05 March 2014 11:58

Apple's new glass is rubbish

Written by Nick Farrell



Corning executive foams at the mouth about sapphire

While the tame Apple Press gets all moist about the fruity cargo cults sapphire crystal as a display material, it seems that others in the glass industry have other views. Tony Tripeny, a senior vice president at Corning Glass slammed sapphire crystal as a display material in an obvious dig at Apple. To be fair, Corning makes Gorilla Glass so it is not going to say something nice about Apple going to a rival material, but Tripney's response does create a few questions for those who might have shares in Jobs’ Mob.

Sapphire is 10 times more expensive, 1.6 times heavier, environmentally unfriendly, takes about 100 times more energy to generate a Sapphire crystal, transmits less and it breaks. Tripeny said that while Sapphire is scratch resistant Corning testing says that Gorilla Glass can take about 2.5 times more pressure before it breaks.  

“So when we look at it, we think from an overall industry and trend that is not attractive in consumer electronics,” he said.

Tripeny added that if round crystal manufacturing was a business that was attractive to enter into, we certainly would be able to do it. He said that it was too expensive to make because the formation takes about 4,000 times longer than Gorilla Glass at a significantly higher melting temperature. Its hardness makes machining more difficult and costly. Then the cost per unit increases exponentially because when you have defects in boundaries in the crystal growth process, you essentially cut them out.

“Unlike glass, where we have developed technologies so that we can have [a] very large pristine pieces of glass, when you have that on crystals, what you end up doing is always having a yield issue. So it is really those items that make things more expensive,” he said.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments