Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 10 May 2013 16:20

San Francisco backs down on mobile phone radiation labeling

Written by Nick Farrell



Lawyers win

San Francisco reluctantly agreed to drop a controversial ‘radiation labelling scheme’ for new mobile phones, not because there was anything wrong with the idea, but because it can’t afford to fight phone companies in court.

The city had proposed a local law requiring retailers to warn consumers about the radiation levels of the mobile handsets they are buying. However mobile phone industry insisted that there was no evidence of harm from phones and the law was wrong. But the decision to back down seems to be a result of legal costs, rather than a resolution of fears about phone radiation.

The city’s Board of Supervisors voted on Tuesday to settle a lawsuit with the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, a trade body which represents most of the mobile phone operators in the United States. San Francisco reluctantly accepted a permanent injunction against the right-to-know mobile phone ordinance, after the trade body successfully argued in court that the law violated its free-speech rights. The mobile industry trade body had argued that the law misled consumers about the relative risks posed by mobile phones and contradicted the FCC’s determination that all wireless phones legally sold in the Unites States are safe.

In other words it was defeated by aggressive legal tactics from the phone companies. Ellen Marks, an advocate for the measure said the move was a terrible blow to public health. Her husband suffers from a brain tumour on the same side of his head to which he most often held his mobile phone. Of course if people do start dropping dead from brain tumours, then it is fairly likely that they will sue the government alongside the phone companies. But that will be decades into the future, if it every happens.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments