Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 10 January 2008 10:39

Radeon HD 3670 benchmarked

Written by test
Image

Draws more power than the 2600 XT

Expreview seems to be on a roll today, as not only did they benchmark the GeForce 9600 GT, but they've also tested AMD's new ATI Radeon HD 3670 card. This will replace the current Radeon HD 2600 XT, but looking at the early benchmark figures, this is a highly dissapointing card.

Compared to the Radeon HD 2600 XT, the HD 3670 is not a great improvement and with the current drivers, it's no more than five percent faster in most games, although it seems to be slightly better in F.E.A.R. and World in Conflict. However, it's also a lot worse than the 2600 XT in Half Life 2 Episode 2, as it's as much as 19.5 percent slower at 1,600x1,200.

Power consumption is also up over the 2600 XT, which is really strange, and it draws 8W more at idle and 7W more at load. AMD didn't move up to a 256-bit memory interface, either, so this looks like a card best avoided unless AMD can sort out some serious driver fix before the card is released, which we would expect them to.

Nonetheless, if you were holding on to see what the 3670 had to offer, we'd suggest to go for a 3850, as this looks like the way to go if you want an ATI card with reasonable performance that doesn't cost a small fortune.

More here
Last modified on Thursday, 10 January 2008 13:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments