Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 23 October 2009 12:38

Molex and Foxconn bury the hatchet

Written by Nick Farell

Image

DisplayPort license agreed


Molex and Foxconn
Electronics have settled a US dispute regarding the scope of a DisplayPort Standard license agreement.

Neither has admitted any wrongdoing. However Foxconn has been granted a separate, worldwide, royalty-bearing license giving it the right to sell non-standard connectors using the DisplayPort mating interface, and having a through-hole mounting interface.

In case you've been living in a cave for the past few years, DisplayPort is a standard for a digital audio/video interconnect between a computer and a display monitor. The US court case started when Foxconn claimed that Molex granted it a license to patents necessary to implement DisplayPort. The licensed technology covered surface mount technology and through-hole mounting technology. These are different methods for mounting electronic circuits.

Foxconn sued Molex in 2008, claiming that the outfit had sent letters and made oral statements to Foxconn's customers and prospective customers, asserting that Foxconn was acting outside the scope of the license and was infringing Molex's patents.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments