Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 23 October 2009 12:38

Molex and Foxconn bury the hatchet

Written by Nick Farell

Image

DisplayPort license agreed


Molex and Foxconn
Electronics have settled a US dispute regarding the scope of a DisplayPort Standard license agreement.

Neither has admitted any wrongdoing. However Foxconn has been granted a separate, worldwide, royalty-bearing license giving it the right to sell non-standard connectors using the DisplayPort mating interface, and having a through-hole mounting interface.

In case you've been living in a cave for the past few years, DisplayPort is a standard for a digital audio/video interconnect between a computer and a display monitor. The US court case started when Foxconn claimed that Molex granted it a license to patents necessary to implement DisplayPort. The licensed technology covered surface mount technology and through-hole mounting technology. These are different methods for mounting electronic circuits.

Foxconn sued Molex in 2008, claiming that the outfit had sent letters and made oral statements to Foxconn's customers and prospective customers, asserting that Foxconn was acting outside the scope of the license and was infringing Molex's patents.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments