Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 02 September 2009 10:44

Aussie government sits on censorship trial results

Written by Nick Farell


Image

Embarrassment


The
Australian Government which thought it would save the world if it was allowed to censor the internet is sitting on the results of technology trials.

The trails were supposed to answer the question as to whether or not ISPs could censor the world wide wibble without the whole lot going tits up. Opposition politicians say that the report was written ages ago but the government is refusing to release it. Obviously it does not say what they want to hear, namely that effective censorship of the Internet using white and black lists is impossible.

The Opposition's communications spokesman, Nick Minchin, today called on the Communications Minister, Stephen Conroy, to "end this farce and produce his long overdue trial results for independent assessment". Live trials of the filtering policy, which is intended to block "prohibited content" for all Australians as determined by a secret Government blacklist, were initially slated to begin in December last year and take about six weeks. The publication was pushed back until July, then September and, today, the Government is still unable to put a date on when it will release the results to the great unwashed.

The plan is less popular than a tax on beer and sex in Australia. Some think that the government will use the report to quietly axe the plan. However it would mean breaking an election promise to wrap children and adults in bubble wrap so that they cannot be harmed by anything which could not be handled by a nun, retired colonel, fundamentalist Christian or looney.

It is not as if the Government didn't try to fix the test so that it could work. Only Eight small ISPs and one big one tested the software on a limited basis. How that would reflect into the real world where there are huge amounts of data involved, the government did not say. To make matters worse, the Government has said that it has no criteria to determine whether the trials of the scheme were a success.

Last year a report told the government that its filtering policy was fundamentally flawed. The government tried to sit on that report too, but it was leaked to the media.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments