Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 02 July 2009 12:42

Usenet.com taken to the cleaners

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Judge calls it pirate's paradise


Usenet.com was taken to the cleaners by the Music and Film industry in a ruling that was not really a surprise.

Punters used to pay $4.95 to $18.95 a month for the privilege of accessing the newsgroups. The outfit was refused to use the “safe harbour” defence often quoted by Google because the Judge felt the outfit's advertising seemed to encourage illegal use.

One of the problems was that Usenet.com went so far as to insert meta tags into its website HTML that included terms like "warez" and "kazaa." Its tutorials included instructions on how to use the service used infringing music files as examples. Even Usenet.com's own customer survey which showed that 42 percent of its responding subscribers said the downloading music was a "primary" reason for signing up.

It didn't help that after it was sued, Usenet.com did its best to wind up the Judge with a repeated pattern of evidence spoliation and stonewalling from Usenet.com. Getting discovery from Usenet.com was as easy as getting a mortgage from a British Bank. There was a story of wiped hard-drives, employees disappearing to Europe, in short everything that could indicate to the Judge that Newsnet.com was not exactly kosher.

Steven Marks, General Counsel for the RIAA, said in a statement that the decision is another example of courts recognizing the value of copyrighted music and taking action against companies and individuals who are engaging in wide scale infringement.

The ruling is however strangely unsatisfying. Usenet.com did appear to be a pirate and did appear to do its utmost to avoid capture. It did not prove anything as far as the greater issue of P2P downloading and did nothing to prove the validity or otherwise of the rest of the Music Industry's anti-piracy antics.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments