Featured Articles

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

It appears that Nvidia has been feeling the pulse of the market and took some note from comments regarding the original…

More...
iPhone 6 and 6 Plus reviews are up and they are good

iPhone 6 and 6 Plus reviews are up and they are good

Apple is dancing the same dance year after year. It releases the iPhone and two days before they start shipping it…

More...
Amazon announces three new tablets

Amazon announces three new tablets

Amazon has just released three new tablets starting with the $99 priced 6-inch Kindle Fire HD6. This is a 6-inch tablet…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 01 August 2008 07:17

Sprint early termination fees illegal

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Court rules against Sprint, orders refunds

The Judge in a case filed against Sprint Nextel has ruled that the early termination fees charged by the company against its customers are excessive. The Judge ruled that Sprint Nextel should pay back $18.2 million in these types of collected fees to consumers, making this a decision that could influence decisions in similar wireless carriers’ cases across the U.S.

The Judge also ruled that the service contracts weren’t legal and that in addition to refunding the termination fees that Sprint Nextel must stop its efforts to collect another $54.7 million in uncollected termination fees from its customers.

Verizon Wireless has already been sued in California and settled the claim by agreeing to pay $21 million to customers.

Early termination fees of customer contracts have been used by carriers as a means to retain customers and to guarantee revenue, since the sales of cell phones are not a big profit margin. Wireless carriers have imposed stiff fees that border on punitive, as they can be as much as high as $200 per line for customers who terminate their service contracts before their expiration date.

Consumer groups argue that the early termination fees penalize customers and discourage carrier competition by limiting consumers’ ability to shop for competitive rates before their services contracts expire.

The FCC is currently considering a proposal that allow it to regulate these types of fees. It is not clear what impact the FCC’s authority would have on pending litigation.

Last modified on Friday, 01 August 2008 07:38

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments