Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 07 July 2014 11:25

Android Wear installed on 10.000+ phones

Written by Fuad Abazovic

So says Google Play

Android Wear should be one of the first steps towards a wearable revolution and so far it is off to a slow start. Android Wear watches started shipping a few days ago and Google Play indicates that between 10 and 50 thousand users downloaded the mobile app.

We have read some of the entries indicating that quite a few people installed the software without having a Google watch to match it to. You do need Android Wear to actually use the software and connect your smartphone and smartwatch, otherwise the watch won't be able to synchronise or work as it is supposed to. 

Battery life remains an issue

The Qualcomm Toq is an alternative to Android Wear and it needed almost three quarters to hit 10,000 to 50,000 installations, but then again Google Wear has much better chances of success due to Google’s dedication to this emerging platform.

What bugs us about Google Wear watches is that they have around 36 hours of battery life at best, despite their relatively bulky appearance. The Qualcomm Toq looks slimmer, and its E-paper Mirasol display lets it run for up to 5 days or at least three days (72 hours) in a heavy use scenario.

Samsung priced its Gear Live at $199 which might be the winning price and LG G watch is selling for $219 and they both look alike with its square design. Motorola 360 won the hearts of many but it comes at later time this summer and it will cost more than $219.

The next big thing?

The aesthetics should not be overlooked, either. Round LCDs are not cheap or easy to come by and it remains to be seen if Google Wear can reach some high sales numbers. It will get better with time, it will get thinner, smarter, faster just like smartphones. Round units like the Moto 360 are likely to have a lot more mainstream appeal.

Many analysts and industry veterans we talked to expect wearable technology to become very interesting in the near future, but no one expects it to be a high-margin or high-volume business anytime soon. It is likely to grow, but everything has to start somewhere.

Of course when Apple makes a wearable piece of technology that can show time and sits on your wrist, all of a sudden it will sell millions and it will be credited with inventing the smartwatch. We saw this scenario some 7 years earlier with smartphones and it is likely to start happening again in the latter half of the year or beyond.

Last modified on Tuesday, 08 July 2014 07:42
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments