Featured Articles

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

IHS has told Recode that the Apple iPad Air 2 16GB Wifi costs only $275 to build -- not bad…

More...
LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

As Samsung is losing market share, another Korean company, which many had written off, is gaining.

More...
LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R is probably the best looking Android Wear device on the market and many have been waiting for…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 03 July 2014 10:54

Blood chips thing of the past

Written by Nick Farrell

Intel improves its supply chain

Intel’s long running battle to purge its supply chain of elements which come from war torn countries is over. The Santa Clara Company’s officials has announced that it had rid their supply chain of minerals from Congo sold by militias that commit gross human rights abuses.

According to the SF Gate Intel did this off its own bat and not because they had been shamed by anyone else. Of course while there might have been obvious moral decisions here, the move pre-empted government regulation and boosted corporate reputation, supply chain expertise and employee morale. It has taken a long time. Intel has been working with suppliers to identify the source of minerals and make sure the company was not unwittingly financing war crimes since 2009.

In 2008, Intel had never even heard of the term "conflict minerals" when it received a letter from several non-government organizations. The group said four minerals - gold, tin, tantalum, tungsten - the company uses to make micro processing chips might have originated in mines that funded rebel groups and militias in Congo.

The trade was similar to "blood diamonds," in which groups in Liberia and Sierra Leone financed armies through diamond sales. Such groups have been responsible for war crimes like murder, rape and forced enlistment of children as soldiers. Intel wanted to be no part of it, but when it contacted its suppliers it did not get good results so it went direct to the smelters and factories. It wanted to establish "a chain of custody" across the supply chain.

Apparently it took some effort as the smelters weren't eager to sign up just to do the right thing. Intel's strategy was to patiently address their concerns until the smelters ran out of objections. In 2010, Congress passed the landmark Dodd-Frank Act, which, among other things, required companies to disclose whether or not they were using conflict minerals. Intel was ahead because it had done all of the pre-work.

It has also not needed to pull out of Congo, which would suffer greatly if it did and would increase Intel’s costs.

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments