Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 10 March 2014 12:03

Amazon might find the UK more taxing

Written by Nick Farrell


 
Bought to book

The online bookseller Amazon might suddenly find that the UK is more taxing than it would like. A UK judge ruled earlier this month that Amazon had infringed the trademark of soap maker Lush by posting advertisements on Google mentioning "Lush soap" and by offering customers who searched for "Lush soap" on its own website a list of options.

Lush was not available on Amazon's UK website because the manufacturer did not want to sell it there. The judge ruled customers could be confused because they could go to Amazon looking for coconut soap which looks like sweeties and not find it. Amazon attempted to get out of the case with some footwork claiming that only its main European operating subsidiary, Luxembourg-based Amazon EU and not the group's UK subsidiary, Amazon.co.uk should be a defendant.

Amazon EU ran the UK business from Luxembourg, and that the British subsidiary simply provided services such as warehousing to the Amazon group. What is important is that by the Judge disagreeing, he opened the way for Amazon to be forced to pay tax in the UK. The somewhat silly Luxembourg argument is the basis of Amazon's claim that its retail business doesn't have a tax residence in Britain and that therefore, all revenues and profits should be declared in low-tax Luxembourg.

However, the Judge pointed out that Amazon's depiction of the role of the UK unit was "wholly unreal and divorced from the commercial reality of the situation.” While it might not force Amazon to pay tax straight away, the ruling could encourage the tax authority, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, to take a closer look at Amazon's structure.

If Amazon's arguments were not accepted by the court, it could mean that HMRC might look more critically at what Amazon has been saying.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments