Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 29 July 2013 12:29

Why does Android have a Root requirement?

Written by Nick Farrell

Security hole waiting to happen

A top Android developer has questioned why Android the huge security hole which is the root requirement. Steve Kondik wrote that Android 4.3 introduces some new and much needed security features which not only restrict setuid binaries on the system partition (su), but also limit the capabilities of processes.

In the current architecture, even if you could get elevated privileges, you can't do anything out of the ordinary. Root in the shell via ADB is all I use, and it still works just fine, he said. He said he had no problems as when there is a situation that I'd need root, I just modify the system to accommodate what I'm trying to accomplish in a secure way.

Kondik understood the desire to have full root on stock ROMs, but he said that things had reached a point where it was better to consider better options than root based systems.

“Going forward, I'm interested in building framework extensions and APIs into CM to continue to abolish the root requirement, he said

The only real need to use root requirements include firewalls and network software, potentially requiring raw sockets, managing the DNS resolver and tweaking various sysfs nodes to control the kernel. Since all these can be done without exposing root, and they can be done in a very secure way why bother?

blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments