Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 09 June 2008 06:57

FTC to investigate Intel

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Ongoing Trade Practices to be Examined


The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched a formal investigation of Intel Corporation.  The FTC launched its antitrust investigation after similar probes have taken place in Europe and Asia, but did not indicate the exact reasons why it is investigating Intel. Intel has been long accused by its rivals, including Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), of gaining its huge market dominance through abusive tactics, and AMD filed an action against Intel based on this claim in 2005. Intel’s microprocessors are found on more than 80 percent of the world’s PCs.  Intel and the FTC reached a settlement agreement in a former FTC investigation in 1999.

Intel had been under an informal investigation by the FTC until several months ago, and the FTC did confirm that the matter has not been upgraded to a formal investigation. Intel indicated through its General Counsel that it has been cooperating with the FTC’s existing informal probe by supplying hundreds of thousands of documents, and that it would continue to cooperate. Bruce Sewell, General Counsel, told Reuters news in a telephone interview, "We don't believe that there's been abusive behavior or illegal behavior. The record here is so strong in our favor."

Also, the Attorney General’s office of the State of New York has been formally investigating Intel since January to determine whether Intel violated New York State antitrust laws in its efforts to squeeze AMD out of the market there. A year ago, the European Commission in Brussels formally charged Intel with selling chips below cost and offering customers huge rebates in an illegal marketing attempt to eliminate AMD. And Japan’s Trade Commission ruled in 2005 that Intel had, in fact, violated Japan’s anti-monopoly laws. Intel accepted the finding, which allowed it to avoid a trial there.

AMD sued Intel in 2005 for giving illegal discounts to computer manufacturers and for retaliating against manufacturers who used AMD chips, and against retail stores that provided sizeable shelf space for computers containing AMD chipsets. AMD’s lawsuit is ongoing against Intel, but last week the U.S. District Court in Delaware postponed hearing the case for trial until 2010.

It seems that governments and commissions worldwide agree that Intel has engaged in improper conduct, but their remedies so far have not been sufficiently meaningful or long lasting as to cause Intel to change its ongoing practices.  AMD will have to bide its time until 2010. Let’s hope it can wait that long.

Last modified on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 09:37

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments