Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 22 March 2013 10:19

GoPro used DCMA to deal with bad review

Written by Nick Farrell



Claims it was all a mistake

An outfit which makes cameras used for extreme circumstances appears to have tried to use the DCMA in an extreme manner to pull a bad review.

GoPro sent a DMCA takedown notice to DigitalRev, a photography shopping and discussion site. It managed to get the review, titled "GOPRO Hero 3 vs SONY HDR-AS15—Which Action Camera should you get?" pulled and was replaced with a letter from GoPro.

GoPro's brand manager claimed that the review needed to be taken down because of what he calls a "trademark" violation which is something that was not covered by the DMCA, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Of course when the situation appeared on reddit the company backpeddled and called the episode an "unfortunate miscommunication.”

It claimed that it welcomed editorial reviews of our products but the letter was sent because DigitalRev is not an authorized reseller of GoPro products and they were using images and had incorrect branding and representation of its product in its online commerce store.

If that was the case then this is admission that it was mis-using the DCMA and it does raise some questions at to what the company was really playing at.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments