Featured Articles

Gainward GTX 780 3GB previewed

Gainward GTX 780 3GB previewed

The Gainward GTX 780 is now available priced at about US $649/€649, but we're hoping it will be available for a…

More...
GTX 780 available in US stores

GTX 780 available in US stores

The GTX 780, a trimmed down version of the Geforce Titan, is out and we wrote that almost a dozen…

More...
Newegg claims Shield comes on June 30

Newegg claims Shield comes on June 30

It is no secret that for the last few days you can pre-order Nvidia Shield, at least if you are based…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the GTX 780

Nvidia officially launches the GTX 780

Just as we wrote a couple of days ago, Nvidia has picked the 23rd of May as the official launch date…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 22 March 2013 10:19

GoPro used DCMA to deal with bad review

Written by Nick Farrell



Claims it was all a mistake

An outfit which makes cameras used for extreme circumstances appears to have tried to use the DCMA in an extreme manner to pull a bad review.

GoPro sent a DMCA takedown notice to DigitalRev, a photography shopping and discussion site. It managed to get the review, titled "GOPRO Hero 3 vs SONY HDR-AS15—Which Action Camera should you get?" pulled and was replaced with a letter from GoPro.

GoPro's brand manager claimed that the review needed to be taken down because of what he calls a "trademark" violation which is something that was not covered by the DMCA, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Of course when the situation appeared on reddit the company backpeddled and called the episode an "unfortunate miscommunication.”

It claimed that it welcomed editorial reviews of our products but the letter was sent because DigitalRev is not an authorized reseller of GoPro products and they were using images and had incorrect branding and representation of its product in its online commerce store.

If that was the case then this is admission that it was mis-using the DCMA and it does raise some questions at to what the company was really playing at.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments