Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 22 January 2013 11:38

Google wants to kill passwords

Written by Nick Farrell



Gmail will use something different


Google is looking at sprucing up the way we use passwords to authenticate ourselves on computers.

The search engine has had enough of people finding passwords and filling the world with spam, also having to constantly remind users what their password is. Apparently Google Vice President of Security Eric Grosse and Engineer Mayank Upadhyay said that passwords and simple bearer tokens such as cookies are no longer sufficient to keep users safe.

Their cunning plan is to use smartphones armed with an NFC enabled security device. This would mean that you could sign in to Gmail or authorize a computer to use. The downside of this idea is that if you lose your smartphone someone would have access to your computer.

So Grosse and Upadhyay think that passwords will exist they will just be a second level of protection and be less important. Pity really I was hoping that they would come up with something that does not require me to remember my mum’s maiden name or my dead dog’s birthday.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments