Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 26 July 2012 12:12

Apple should not have to pay Samsung

Written by Nick Farrell



Court to hear interesting defence


Jobs's Mob had an interesting defence when it came to its US court case versus Samsung. In the case Apple claimed that while Samsung owed it billions for using its patents it did not owe Samsung money for using its patents.

Apple claimed Samsung wanted a higher patent royalty than Apple pays to other companies, at a rate the South Korean company has never sought from any other licensee. Samsung is demanding a 2.4 percent rate on the "entire selling price" of Apple's mobile products, Apple said in the court filing.

It said that Samsung's royalty demands were multiple times more than Apple has paid any other patentees for licenses to their declared-essential patent portfolios. Samsung said that its royalty demands were consistent with industry norms.  Our guess is that Apple is so used to bullying other companies to charge it less it thinks that what it thinks is normal is the going rate.

However when Apple looks at what it thinks Samsung owes it for its patents the figure comes to most of the cost of making Samsung's gear. Samsung pointed out that Apple never made a counter offer to its original request.  It just refused to pay at all.
So far Apple has not paid Samsung a dime for Apple's use of Samsung's standards-essential technology.



Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments