Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 20 April 2012 10:29

Agony Aunt helps UK committee sort out net censorship

Written by Nick Farrell



Nothing like asking an expert


It appears that an Independent Parliamentary Inquiry into Online Child Protection might have had a few difficulties finding experts  when it came to the thorny issue of internet censorship.

The committee, which recommends that ISPs should censor internet content, to save children from trolls, er terrorists, sorry paedophiles, got its answers by asking Sun agony aunt Dear Deidre. “Dear Deidre” Sanders was the Inquiry’s first expert witness. She told the committee that kids should be protected from online pornography, but it was OK with children looking at Page 3 girls because “the Editor of The Sun thinks it’s okay” and because 9 million people read it.

So that sorts that out, we expect a comic book style strip with two couples in their under wear to explain the point. Generally the report makes amusing reading and is probably a good reason why politicians should not be allowed near technology questions. For example the committee Chairman Claire Perry MP appear to think that TalkTalk’s network-level filter would work on an ISP's server  without question or an alternative view.

TalkTalk’s HomeSafe doesn’t stop kids looking at whatever they like via smartphone apps and only blocks browser traffic.  It uses filters websites against a blacklist.  Ironically this means that it would censor Perry’s website which hosts the report. The committee also thought it would be easy to censor the internet in the UK based on the same standards that Ofcom and the British Board of Film Classification use. So now a blog will be rated in the same way as a movie.

Of course the Censor has to look at a few hundred flicks a year, when, if Perry gets her way, the Interent will mean ranking a few hundred billion. The report does point out the concerns about two of the biggest ISPs on the grounds.  But it writes these off saying that “their main objections appeared to be ideological, not commercial”.  In other words the idea of censoring the connections of millions of British internet users is not something that should trouble UK politicians.  

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments