Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 20 April 2012 10:29

Agony Aunt helps UK committee sort out net censorship

Written by Nick Farrell



Nothing like asking an expert


It appears that an Independent Parliamentary Inquiry into Online Child Protection might have had a few difficulties finding experts  when it came to the thorny issue of internet censorship.

The committee, which recommends that ISPs should censor internet content, to save children from trolls, er terrorists, sorry paedophiles, got its answers by asking Sun agony aunt Dear Deidre. “Dear Deidre” Sanders was the Inquiry’s first expert witness. She told the committee that kids should be protected from online pornography, but it was OK with children looking at Page 3 girls because “the Editor of The Sun thinks it’s okay” and because 9 million people read it.

So that sorts that out, we expect a comic book style strip with two couples in their under wear to explain the point. Generally the report makes amusing reading and is probably a good reason why politicians should not be allowed near technology questions. For example the committee Chairman Claire Perry MP appear to think that TalkTalk’s network-level filter would work on an ISP's server  without question or an alternative view.

TalkTalk’s HomeSafe doesn’t stop kids looking at whatever they like via smartphone apps and only blocks browser traffic.  It uses filters websites against a blacklist.  Ironically this means that it would censor Perry’s website which hosts the report. The committee also thought it would be easy to censor the internet in the UK based on the same standards that Ofcom and the British Board of Film Classification use. So now a blog will be rated in the same way as a movie.

Of course the Censor has to look at a few hundred flicks a year, when, if Perry gets her way, the Interent will mean ranking a few hundred billion. The report does point out the concerns about two of the biggest ISPs on the grounds.  But it writes these off saying that “their main objections appeared to be ideological, not commercial”.  In other words the idea of censoring the connections of millions of British internet users is not something that should trouble UK politicians.  

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments