Featured Articles

Intel takes credit for three-way 4K gaming

Intel takes credit for three-way 4K gaming

All of a sudden Intel is talking about desktop gaming like there is no tomorrow and it is pushing it. The…

More...
Nvidia Shield Tablet 32GB 4G LTE out for pre orders

Nvidia Shield Tablet 32GB 4G LTE out for pre orders

Nvidia has finally revealed the shipping date of its Shield Tablet 32GB in 4G LTE flavour and in case you pre-order…

More...
Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple announces its Apple Watch

Apple has finally unveiled its eagerly awaited smartwatch and surprisingly it has dropped the "i" from the brand, calling it simply…

More...
Skylake 14nm announced

Skylake 14nm announced

Kirk B. Skaugen, Senior Vice President General Manager, PC Client Group has showcased Skylake, Intel’s second generation 14nm architecture.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 13 February 2012 20:45

Google fights Apple, Microsoft and Cisco over patents

Written by Nick Farrell



Worldwide standards under threat


A battle is brewing within the big software outfits over the enforcement of patents which are part of agreed standards. For years those who have patents on things which are agreed standards have allowed their use at a reasonable rate.  It was pretty much a gentlemen’s agreement.

However that was before Apple and Microsoft started patent trolling in a bid to kill off Android.  Apple, in particular, refused to sell patents to rivals and litagated to get them removed from the market.  Since the only means of defence was to get patents of your own, this has meant defending patents which companies need to buy  to meet standards. Now Google is at odds with Apple, Microsoft and Cisco over the licensing and litigation of patents. Some of it is because  Google wants to make the most of patents it will receive if its acquisition of Motorola is approved, the others want to change the way so-called essential patents are licensed.

Essential patents are part of a standard and licensed under fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms or reasonable, and non-discriminatory (RAND) terms. When patent-infringement negotiations over what that means fail, Google wants to continue to be able to use injunctions to block the sale of infringing products, while the others want to remove that option.

Back in November, Apple sent a letter to ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute), which was made public this week, detailing the need for more consistency with the licensing of essential patents. Apple’s suggested terms include the promise to not try to block the sale of products when negotiations have failed. Cisco and Microsoft have agreed.

Normally we would have through Google would have gone for it too.  But right now it is fighting off shedloads of patent-infringement cases from Apple.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments