Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 01 September 2011 20:26

Apple mulls USB 3.0 for future products

Written by


Cheaper than Thunderbolt, backwards compatible
Apple is apparently looking into USB 3.0 as an addition to costly Thunderbolt technology. According to VR Zone, Apple could go USB 3.0 even before Intel integrates USB 3.0 support in its chipsets.

Many observers were dumbfounded by Apple’s decision to hold off on USB 3.0 support, which was apparently passed over in favor of Thunderbolt, a much more advanced, but also a lot pricier standard. Apple is now apparently looking into third party USB 3.0 host controllers, which are said to cost about $2 to $3 in large quantities. Thunderbolt on the other hand costs $10 to $15 and it is a pretty costly solution, so it is unlikely to gain much traction in cheap peripherals and low end storage products.

Another perk would be backward compatibility. While Thunderbolt is a state-of-the-art standard, USB 2.0 is like the AK-47 of the tech world. It’s cheap, in widespread use and it just gets the job done. Apple is also looking into some more affordable approaches to Thunderbolt storage, which could result in reasonable priced storage solutions for individual consumers. Did we say reasonable? Strike that, this is Apple we are talking about.

More here.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+2 #1 Jermelescu 2011-09-02 01:35
Problem, Intel? :-x
 
 
+1 #2 Alterecho 2011-09-02 02:56
According to Semiaccurate, they have seen the iPhone 5 and it has a display port. But they later speculate that its actually a thunderbolt port.

So that could be the possible reason for the presence of thunderbolt only on the Macbooks.
 
 
+2 #3 fingerbob69 2011-09-02 11:46
Every walled garden needs a gate.
 
 
-1 #4 TEAMSWITCHER 2011-09-02 16:11
I don't think that Apple is anti USB3, they really wanted an elegant docking solution for their mobile products and USB3 can't do video. I don't understand how 10-15 dollars is a costly solution, I would gladly pay that much more to have a Thunderbolt port on any computer. I love the new Thunderbolt display that Apple will be selling soon. And I like the laptop-as-a-desktop usage model, it's the best of both worlds. In my opinion, there is a need for both USB3 and Thunderbolt.
 
 
0 #5 Wolfdale 2011-09-05 23:48
problem is.. 2-3 dollar for a usb3 allready translates to 49.99 on apple value to customers..
if it would be 10-15 dollar for a thunderbolt, apple will be forced to charge 249.99 for it...
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments