Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 19 August 2011 08:53

Stanford comes up with better organic displays

Written by Nick Farell
y_exclamation

More flexible than a Romanian gymnast
Stanford and Harvard boffins have emerged from their smoke filled labs with faster organic semiconductors for flexible displays. According to a Stanford University press release, they have created a new material for high-speed organic semiconductors with a new manufacturing method that can take years off the development time line.

The display world is jolly excited about organic semiconductors but they haven’t yet reached the speeds needed to drive high definition displays. This has forced them to use inorganic materials such as silicon, which are fast and durable but don’t bend. The new organic electronic material has also taken ages to make because boffins had to brew up large numbers of candidate materials and then test them.

The Stanford boffins decided to try a computational predictive approach to substantially narrow the field of candidates before expending the time and energy to make any of them. Anatoliy Sokolov, a postdoctoral researcher in chemical engineering at Stanford who worked on synthesizing the material, said that synthesizing some of these compounds can take years.

Sokolov used a material known as DNTT, which had already been shown to be a good organic semiconductor. They looked at different compounds possessing chemical and electrical properties that seemed likely to enhance the parent material’s performance if they were attached.

After they whittled it down to a short list of seven promising candidates the Harvard team predicted that two of the seven candidates would most readily accept a charge. They calculated that one of those two was markedly faster in passing that charge from molecule to molecule, so that became their choice. From their analysis, they worked out the new material to be about twice as fast as its parent.

Sokolov said it took about a year and a half to perfect the synthesis of the new compound and make enough of it for testing. “Our final yield from what we produced was something like 3 percent usable material and then we still had to purify it.”

But what was important was that when the team members tested the final product, their predictions were borne out and the modified material doubled the speed of the parent material. Apparently their new material is more than 30 times faster than the amorphous silicon currently used for liquid crystal displays in products such as flat panel televisions and computer monitors.

Normally it would have taken several years to both synthesize and characterize all the seven candidate compounds. With this approach, the boffins could focus on the most promising candidate with the best performance, as predicted by theory.


Last modified on Friday, 19 August 2011 09:45

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+2 #1 Marburg_U 2011-08-19 11:11
>Organic materials
>Imaging technology

I pretend at least a 7 years warranty.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments