Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 22 February 2008 11:58

RIAA's file sharing expert 'borderline incompetent'

Written by

Image

Professor slams tech expert


Dr. Doug Jacobson, the tech expert behind many of the RIAA's P2P cases, has been slammed as being borderline incompetent by a top professor.

Professor Johan Pouwelse says that evidence Jacobson has been presenting before U.S. courts for the RIAA, which proves the music industry has caught the right person, was seriously flawed.

Pouwelse, who is testifying on behalf of Marie Lindor, said that procedures that need to verify hat a specific computer had been uploading copyright works have not been taken.

He added that RIAA expert witness work lacked “in-depth analysis” and “proper scientific scrutiny” while reports were described as “factually erroneous.”

Pouwelse claims that techniques used by the RIAA's Media Sentry have not been properly tested, are “overly simplistic” and “fail the test for accurate peer to peer file sharing measurement.”

He said Jacobson’s methods were “self-developed,” “unpublished” and not accepted by the scientific community. Jacobson’s investigative process was “unprofessional.”

In his summary, Pouwelse said that Jacobson has shown “borderline incompetence” and that the “allegations of copyright violations are not proven.”

More here.
Last modified on Saturday, 23 February 2008 04:38

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments