Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 27 June 2011 09:48

Eight core Bulldozer overclocked to 4.63GHz

Written by Nedim Hadzic

1.5V for Super Pi
An engineering sample of AMD’s FX-8130P managed to hit a quite mouthwatering 4.63GHz.

The CPU should be AMD’s fastest Bulldozer offering and its eight cores run at 3.8GHz, or up to 4.2GHz with AMD’s Turbo Core 2.0. It has 8MB of L2 cache, 8MB of L3 cache, supports DDR3 1866MHz and is said to have a 125W TDP.

Pushing it to stable 4.63GHz and completing Super Pi required around 1.5V. You can read more here.


Last modified on Monday, 27 June 2011 10:01
blog comments powered by Disqus


+37 #1 loadwick 2011-06-27 10:16
I wouldn't say 4.6GHz is anything special, its only +9.5% increase over what the chip is rated to work at (4.2GHz), ok i guess its on all the cores but SB hits 5GHz fairly easily and SB-E should do even better. Plus 22nm Ivy Bridge is only a few months away which you would think would overclock even better again.

My hope is that this is the stepping that has been sent back to get re-spun to increase the performance.

On saying that, 1.29 seconds for 1m SuperPI seems awfully fast!!
+10 #2 milkod2001 2011-06-27 10:24
good to know,now when can we buy it, would it be this year or there's gonna be another delay?
+3 #3 arclight 2011-06-27 10:30
Cooling used? 4.6 O.C. from 3.8 Ghz stock doesn't sound like a big leap, specially if the voltage needed was 1,5 V (stock being 1,2V?). If this was done with air cooling it might be acceptable but if it was done with water or more extreme solutions....fails to impress.
+53 #4 neo222 2011-06-27 10:43
compared to 2500k @ 5gh which took 7.2 seconds..i wud saw this is insanely fast!!! 8)
+44 #5 muziqaz 2011-06-27 10:49
Guys, this is early ES chip. And that guy OBR is known as a bit of a Intel fanboy. Where word 'bit' is a huge understatement ;)
That chip he supposedly have is clocked at 2.8ghz at stock.
and it is not 1.29s. Some digits were erased. 1x.x29s.
I don't really see the point of such kind of news or even blogpost. That guys really has some attention issues.
+8 #6 tokad 2011-06-27 10:58
Looks like a fake - to good to be true. The Super Pi output window contains not the usual data (e.g. calculation time for every step).

Look at the following site for Super Pi results and reference screenshots: http://www.techenclave.com/overclocking-n-modding/techenclave-indian-technology-community-superpi-1m-193435.html

Nevertheless, I think BD will be a great midrange to highrange processor.
-63 #7 nakamura19 2011-06-27 11:04
Yep, those screens are edited, and for and eight core processor, 11-whatever seconds isn't impressive. AMD failed again
+18 #8 bene 2011-06-27 11:06
for sure the reason, why the checksum got deleted and some other parts of the screenshot were removed or edited, is that this is a just a very poor fake.

btw i think bulldozer will do a great job, but please use your brain, before posting something like this
+14 #9 Dribble 2011-06-27 11:08
Quoting neo222:
compared to 2500k @ 5gh which took 7.2 seconds..i wud saw this is insanely fast!!! 8)

Superpi results would be displayed as:

The suspiciously large gaps between numbers and the dot suggest that it's not
1.29 but actually 1x.y29 - meaning super pie is between 10 and 20 seconds.

You'll also note all the intermediary second figures that should appear above the "1 . 29s" in that column have been deleted all together.
+2 #10 Nerdfighter 2011-06-27 11:13
What cooling was used? This is an engineering sample, but did it use the retail-revision?

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus


Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments