Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 12 November 2010 11:24

Britain could be jailed for data retention

Written by Nick Farell
y_lawbookhammer

A whole nation doing time
The UK Home Office is about to get dragged into the European Court of Justice over data retention laws in Blighty. For the Home office a rapid review of its Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA) has been undertaken and the UK government is rushing through a consultation document to try to head off a potentially expensive court case brought by the EC.

Changes to RIPA has been online but responses must arrive before December 7. Apparently the EU gave the government two months to take action in October. Under the new plan there would be civil sanctions even against unintentional interception of customer communications. The Interception of Communications Commissioner (IoCC) would gain powers to act against ISPs and telecom carriers.

The IoCC would be able to impose fines of up to £10,000 for unintentional interception. If the breach was shown to be intentional, the penalty could be a prison term of up to two years upon conviction.
The idea is to make the enforcement process more streamlined and reduce the administrative burden on the police, the CPS and courts.

The EC is miffed that the UK government’s lack of action to seal the loopholes in RIPA have allowed BT to snoop on customers using Phorm’s advertising profiling software. With the changes to the rules, Phorm would be outlawed and BT would be in trouble for using it to snoop on customers.

Under EC regulations, consent for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to intercept user communications must be “freely-given, specific and informed” as this was not the case in BT’s use of Phorm, RIPA has been held to be at fault and the Commission requested action which has yet to be taken.

This delay prompted the EC to threaten court proceedings but the issuance of the consultation document may stay the Commission’s hand. If not, the government could be fined millions of Euros for every day that the legal loopholes exist.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+4 #1 MentorSage 2010-11-12 15:29
I smell a rat. Governments are all the same. They tell the sheeple what they want to hear, but behind the scenes they are doing the complete opposite. If you think the EU is your friend, then it's time to wake up and smell the coffee.
 
 
+1 #2 yasin 2010-11-12 22:21
the EU treats the UK, Germany and to some extent France as cash cows.no wonder mr. cameron is trying to get us out.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments