Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 04 November 2010 10:27

Minnesota woman to pay $1.5 million to Capitol Records

Written by Nedim Hadzic
y_lawbookhammer

For 24 songs
The land of the almost free has once again put corporate interests above those of individuals and has ordered a Minnesota woman who illegally downloaded and shared songs to pay $1.5 million to Capitol Records. Seeing how this amount will cover the damage for a staggering number of 24 songs, it would suggest that Capitol Record makes $62,500 per song over the course of 4 years (musicians, take note!).

Jammie Thomas-Rasset’s has been fighting in court since she has originally been charged about four years ago. This was the third time she appeared in court with all three decisions going in favor of the RIAA. This time around, the RIAA was pretty glad that the jury recognized “the severity of the defendant's misconduct” and hopes that Ms. Thomas-Rasset’s will finally accept responsibility for her actions.

Thomas-Rasset is not giving up though and her attorney Kiwi Camara confirmed this by saying that "the fight continues." They intend to bring their case to the chief judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, Judge Davis, who is no stranger to this case. In fact, earlier this year he reduced the previous court-ordered damages calling the figure of $1.9 million “monstrous and shocking”.

Despite the obvious need to either adapt or miss the evolution train, the music recording industry still chooses to pursue and blame individuals for their lack of inventiveness, which is as Don Quixotish as it gets. Unfortunately, in their spare time when the industry is not diligently recording uninspired, washed up bands and shoving them down our throats, this seems to be the best they can come up with. We just wonder how long will it take until we’re all in this article.


Last modified on Thursday, 04 November 2010 11:53

Nedim Hadzic

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments