Featured Articles

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

After USA Nvidia’s Shield comes elsewhere

Project Shield, which is now called Nvidia Shield, is up for preorder, at least if you’re in North America. For…

More...
Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Nvidia won most Haswell high-end notebooks

Our sources in the Far East are claiming that most Haswell notebooks that are coming out in the next few weeks…

More...
Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

Microsoft officially announces the Xbox One

As announced earlier, Microsoft has now finally unveiled its next-generation console, the Xbox One. Although it did not shed much light…

More...
AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD poaches more Nvidia talent

AMD has apparently managed to grab yet another high-ranking Nvidian, but this time it was no engineer or developer.

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Saturday, 25 September 2010 10:18

XFX Secret Weapon tested - HD 5970 Black Edition - 11. Eyefinity Test

Written by Sanjin Rados

xfx-hd-5970-4gb-thumb
Review: Eyefinity 6 and 4GB memory




Playing games with the picture spanning across more monitors can be done with Nvidia or AMD cards, but although both teams have made significant advances, we’d still refrain from calling them finished articles. In this respect AMD has done much better as cards from HD 5000 series will take up to three monitors (Eyefinity editions will take up to 6) whereas three screens on Nvidia cards require SLI. This means you need two graphics cards (except for the GTX 295 with two DVIs and HDMI) since each GPU can only handle two screens.

Not everything is as grand as it seems though, as AMD Eyefinity requires one of the three monitors to be a DisplayPort version. Naturally, DisplayPort monitors don’t come cheap but thankfully there are alternatives. For ultra high resolutions, the alternative is an active DisplayPort/Dual-Link DVI adapter ($100) whereas for resolutions for up to 1920x1200 you can do with an active DisplayPort/Single-Link DVI which is ($30). Sapphire is one of the first to offer this adapter and you can check it out here.

The active DisplayPort/Single-Link DVI adapter will allow for a resolution of 5760x1200 (landscape) or 3600x1920 (portrait).

XFX ships a few adapters with its HD 5970 4GB Black Edition card, among which you’ll find two passive MiniDP-to-Single-Link DVI, one passive MiniDP-to-HDMI and three miniDP-to-DisplayPort adapters. This means that although the card has six video outs, if your three (or all six) monitors only have DVI ins, you’ll have to look for additional active MiniDP-to-DVI adapters.

xfx_5970_black_MiniDPCables

We tested with three 1920x1080 monitors (5760x1080) where one monitor had a DisplayPort video in .

avp3

dirt3

Gaming at 5760x1080 is much more efficient with XFX HD 5970 4GB as the card not only runs overclocked, but it comes with twice the memory on the reference card.

metro3

(Page 11 of 13)
Last modified on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 13:35
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments