Featured Articles

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel has been executing its tick tock strategy flawlessly since January 2006 and now there is some indication that we might…

More...
Xbox One demoed running GTX card

Xbox One demoed running GTX card

It looks like the Xbox One just cannot catch a break. We have stumbled upon a report claiming that Xbox One…

More...
Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell is out and now we have the complete specs for Intel’s first batch of fourth generation Core parts, as well…

More...
EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

Nvidia is hoping that the Geforce GTX 770 will be a very popular product, and EVGA obviously share this view, as…

More...
Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward has now officially unveiled its custom version of the Geforce GTX 770, the Gainward GTX 770 Phantom. Based on the…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 20 December 2007 11:33

TorrentSpy loses copyright case

Written by Fudzilla staff

Image

Tampered with evidence


Torrent search engine, TorrentSpy, has lost its case in a suit brought by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA).

The Judge made a default ruling in the case for the MPAA, stating that the site's owners had tampered with evidence by ignoring a ruling to retain server logs and unique online computer addresses. Torrentspy had originally argued that its servers were based in the Netherlands, and as such, were protected by Dutch law.

"A substantial number of items of evidence have been destroyed," said Judge Florence-Marie Cooper. "Defendants were on notice that this information would be of importance in this case."

TorrentSpy's lawyer, Ira Rothken, claimed that his clients were concerned about user privacy. TorrentSpy is expected to appeal the decision, while the MPAA is pleased with the ruling.

The court will decide on damages at a later date.

More here.

Last modified on Friday, 21 December 2007 02:24

Fudzilla staff

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments