Featured Articles

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

Analyst reveals Apple Watch spec

An analyst has examined the Apple Watch supply chain in an effort to ascertain the exact spec of Cupertino’s new gadget…

More...
Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

Nvidia's first 20nm product is a mobile SoC

For much of the year we were under the impression that the second generation Maxwell will end up as a 20nm…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

Nvidia adjusts GTX 980 and GTX 970 pricing

It appears that Nvidia has been feeling the pulse of the market and took some note from comments regarding the original…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 01 June 2009 15:01

Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P reviewed - 7 Power and Conclusion

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: A good board, but no match for MSI



Power Consumption:

To merely test power consumption is not enough any more and because you dear readers gave us positive feedback. So we measured power-consumption with CineBench and set them in perspective with the results. Please note our results are peak values but that's ok for comparison purposes. Power-Consumption tests for overall consumption were made with Cool'n'Quiet enabled, which does not work on this board if your FSB exceeds 220MHz. Compared to MSI who did built in this option on our (!) request, you see a huge impact at idle powers. Also the VRM layout proves it does not safe energy even at full load.

Image

Image



Image

Image


Conclusion:

In terms of speed this board equals or exceeds the MSI counterpart. There is not much wrong with the layout, besides the buttons, which we would like to see on the "outside" and we don't think it's a smart solution to have cables crossing the board to install eSATA. While we have no critics about a 2oz layer board to keep all parts cool, we don't think the dual lane approach for each phase is a good one. Some years back it was a nice idea to keep voltages stable, but meanwhile with highly integrated parts which can deliver voltages very stable, it's not any more necessary. As we have shown it does not give you any benefit but does increase power consumption. 

We think the BIOS can still be enhanced, by removing useless settings such as floppy, COM1 and LPT1 - as long as they are disabled by default. Also the memory did not work with 1600MHz with our modules which of course have not been tested by Gigabyte, because we are using an i7 kit. But they worked with MSI better. And the most important point, to let the users decide if they want to enable Cool'n'Quiet when overclocking.

The board is already available for about €138,- which is about €10,- less compared to the MSI offering.

Overall the board will not disappoint, because it's stable and gives you much room for overclocking. But as the power-consumption tests have proved, one board is still superior to it. But maybe Gigabyte will improve the BIOS, and if they do so, we will report it.





(Page 7 of 7)
Last modified on Tuesday, 02 June 2009 15:47
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments