Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 08 January 2009 15:44

AMD Phenom II closing the gap - 4 Power, Conclusion

Written by Eliot Kucharik

ImageImage

Review: Competitive again


The most disappointing thing about the new Phenom II is the 125W TDP rating, which is only marginally lower compared to the 140W of the Phenom 9950. AMD did a fine job with regards to the idle power consumption, but need to work a lot to lower the power consumption under load. Since you can overclock your Phenom II, it might be interesting to know how much it'll cost you doing do so. The "PhII 940 GB" shows the processor on the Gigabyte board, MSI has the superior VRM and uses less power. The Q9450 was tested on a Gigabyte EP45-UD3P, while the E7200 run on the MSI P35 which is quite old and not very efficient.

Image

While the Phenom 9850 has the same TDP as the new Phenom II 940, you see it does save about 40W under load and another 25W more when you reduce the VCore to 1.2000V. So if you are not into overclocking try to reduce the VCore to save some cash on your power bill.


Conclusion:

In the little time AMD had, it did the best it could. While it seems some engineers took at least a year off and with a few bumps in the road that slowed AMD down considerably, the chipmaker is finally on the right track. The new CPU is clocked faster as well as performing faster in comparison to its older brother, and it's closing the gap against Intel CPUs.

The price for this new CPU is around €250,- while the 200MHz slower Phenom II 920 is around €30,- cheaper. In our opinion Intel still has the better offer with it's Q9-series, especially in terms of power consumption, but apart from that AMD has closed the gap significantly and is competitive again. With further price reductions we reckon a comeback for AMD is around the corner, especially considering the low motherboard and memory prices.

We liked the fact that it overclocks well and that the total platform cost is much better than Intel's Core i7 platform. The Phenom II works in existing boards and DDR2 is very cheap memory, so the price of an upgrade is around $300 in the US or €250 in Europe. This CPU goes directly after the 45nm Penryn based Core 2 Quad's and it is doing a good job.

Overall its a good CPU and this definitely gets AMD back in the game.


(Page 4 of 4)
Last modified on Thursday, 08 January 2009 21:58
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments