Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 18 December 2008 16:03

Geforce GTX 295 steals ATI's mojo - Benchmark and Conclusion

Written by Sanjin Rados

Image

Preview: Geforce GTX 280 gets another ticker


Testbed

Motherboard: MSI P45D3 Platinum ( Provided by: MSI );
Processor: Intel Core 2 QX9770 Extreme edition at 3.6GHz ( Provided by: Intel );
Memory: Corsair Dominator 12800 7-7-7-24 ( Provided by: Corsair);
HDD: WD VelociRaptor 300G 10,000RPM ( Provided by: SmoothCreation );

Far Cry 2

Image

Image

Image

Performance in Crysis Warhead is affected by some sort of bug at highest resolution, but Nvidia claims it will fix it prior to launch. In Far Cry 2 at 1680x1050, Nvidia is 16 percent faster, while with AA it outruns ATI by 13 percent. At 1920x1200 the GTX is 7 percent faster than the Radeon, and the gap increases to 10 percent when you turn on AA. In 2560x1600, the GTX ends up 8 percent slower than Radeon HD4870 X2, but with AA the GTX 295 jumps back into the lead and ends up 16 percent faster.

Crysis Warhead

Image

Image

Image

In 1680x1050 the GTX 295 outperforms ATI by 45 percent, with 4xAA 8xAF the lead increase by 1 percent. In higher resolutions and with more effects, the gap closes, but Nvidia is still on top. At 1920x1200 it's 48.5 percent faster, but  with AA and AF the difference drops to 30 percent. In 2560 the lead is 38 percent, but after we turned on AA and AF, it dropped to 18 percent below ATI.

Left 4 Dead

Image

Image

Although GTX 295 continues its spell of dominance in this test, too, we recorded the lowest performance difference at 1680x1500 and 4xAA 8xAF - only 0.5%. At 1920x1200 however, Nvidia again gains ground and beats ATI by 9%. At 2560x1600, the GTX 295 is faster by 4.5%, whereas turning on 4xAA and 8xAF results in GTX being faster by 18%.

Fallout 3


Image

Image

Fallout 3 is limited by the platform we've used, and both cards scored almost identical results at all resolutions.

Call of Duty: World At War

Image

Image

At 1680x1050 and 4XAA 16xAF, GTX beats ATI by 12% and it seems Nvidia is just too strong for ATI, as 1920x1200 and 4xAA 16xAF results in Nvidia extending the lead to 14%. At 2560x1600, GTX leads by 8%, but after we turned 4xAA and 16xAF on, the performance difference soars to 31% in Nvidia's favor.



Conclusion

Overall, Nvidia did a good job with the GTX 295. The 55nm GT200 performs well and it's a step in the right direction. It's not very quiet, but not too loud, either, and the power consumption is high, but this is a top of the range card so power consumption is not a priority. However, this is not to say that it's the worst power-hog around, far from it, as it consumes less than HD 4870 X2 in both idle and workload scenarios, which is really impressive, especially after taking today's results into consideration.

Obviously, it has enough power to outperform the HD 4870 X2, but it's hard to make any sort of verdict before we see it in action with finalized drivers and, more importantly, before we see the retail price.

The price is what will make or break it. ATI's HD4870X2 sells for €400, and since a single GTX280 card currently costs over €335. We're not sure about GTX295 pricing, but we're hoping it will sell for around €500.

All in all, it seems like the "performance belt" is getting back to the green corner, but we'll still wait for the final version of this card before we reach our final verdict. However, Nvidia does have an ace up its sleeve for 2009, and you've guessed it, it's Physx.


 

 

(Page 2 of 2)
Last modified on Friday, 19 December 2008 05:14
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments