Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 29 October 2007 23:39

Intel QX9650 reviewed [updated] - 3 Overclocking FSB

Written by Eliot Kucharik

Image Image

Review: Penryn goes up to 4.30GHz with air cooling



In our QX6850 review we had no time to do any overclocking. This time, we include the Kentsfield CPU in our tests to show you the differences.

First, we have to caution anyone who wants to overclock. If you own a Kentsfield the maximal recommended VCore is between 1.4000V and 1.4250V. Also, you need a very good temperature regulating air-cooler. We don't have a test-rig with a water-cooler, but if you do you can expect to go even higher than we did. Not any CPU will go that high, but it should give you an idea how far you can go. Always watch the temperature of the cores, as if they go over 70°C you are in big trouble.

Overclocking FSB:

QX6850:
We have heard and read statements that the QX6850 is not such a good performer on the FSB side. Actually, we were surprised because we managed to go beyond 400MHz FSB (1600MHz) with ease.

Image Image


QX9650:
After the nice results achieved with the QX6850, we thought that the QX9650 would go much higher, but we only got a mere 10MHz more.

Image Image


(Page 3 of 10)
Last modified on Thursday, 01 November 2007 04:28
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments