Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:40

MSI embraces AMD Neo for its X-Slim series

Written by

Image

X610 is out and about

Although it
wasn't officially launched yet, MSI's AMD-based X-Slim X610 found its way to a couple of Russian hacks who put it through its paces. Back in May we said MSI would start using AMD Neo chips in some X-Slim series models in Q3. New will most likely be restricted to larger X-Slim models, the 14-inch X410 and the 15.6-inch X600.

The X610 is pretty closely matched to the CULV-based X600. They share the same chassis, and most of the specs have remained unchanged, 4GB of memory, 250GB of storage and Radeon HD 4330 discrete graphics with 512MB of memory. The X610 uses AMD's Athlon MV-40 at 1.6GHz, and in most benchmarks it ends up somewhat slower than the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500. The differences aren't that big, however, and you're not likely to see much of a difference in everyday use.

Sadly, the reviewers report that battery life is not as good as with the SU3500, and you're looking at less than two hours under full load, around 20 percent less than with the SU3500.

It all comes down to the price. If the X610 ends up significantly cheaper than the €699 Intel version, it could become an interesting alternative. Otherwise, stick to the X600.

You can find a full review here. (In Russian)
Last modified on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:41
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments