Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

AMD Never Settle Forever bundle hits 200-series cards

AMD Never Settle Forever bundle hits 200-series cards

AMD’s Never Settle bundles have been around for a while and the community response has been extremely positive. When AMD launched…

More...
AMD shipping Beema APUs

AMD shipping Beema APUs

According to Lisa Su, SVP & GM, Global Business Units at AMD, Beema notebook parts have started shipping to manufacturers last…

More...
IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:40

MSI embraces AMD Neo for its X-Slim series

Written by

Image

X610 is out and about

Although it
wasn't officially launched yet, MSI's AMD-based X-Slim X610 found its way to a couple of Russian hacks who put it through its paces. Back in May we said MSI would start using AMD Neo chips in some X-Slim series models in Q3. New will most likely be restricted to larger X-Slim models, the 14-inch X410 and the 15.6-inch X600.

The X610 is pretty closely matched to the CULV-based X600. They share the same chassis, and most of the specs have remained unchanged, 4GB of memory, 250GB of storage and Radeon HD 4330 discrete graphics with 512MB of memory. The X610 uses AMD's Athlon MV-40 at 1.6GHz, and in most benchmarks it ends up somewhat slower than the Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500. The differences aren't that big, however, and you're not likely to see much of a difference in everyday use.

Sadly, the reviewers report that battery life is not as good as with the SU3500, and you're looking at less than two hours under full load, around 20 percent less than with the SU3500.

It all comes down to the price. If the X610 ends up significantly cheaper than the €699 Intel version, it could become an interesting alternative. Otherwise, stick to the X600.

You can find a full review here. (In Russian)
Last modified on Tuesday, 18 August 2009 13:41
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments