Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 06 April 2007 10:31

WEP completely insecure

Written by test1

Image 

WEP can be cracked in minutes

 

One of the most insecure protocols of wireless network protection WEP can finally be cracked in a matter of minutes. If you have the possibility, you should upgrade your wireless network with a more secure protocol like WPA1 or WPA2 which are much harder to crack.

 
WEP stands for "Wired Equivalent Privacy", and it is a protocol based on 40 to 104 bit encryption. It should be able to protect your wireless network from "ordinary" users, but if someone wants to steal your bandwidth, it can be done in minutes. So much for privacy in WEP.

 
Data is sent over a wireless network in packets. To crack the WEP protection and extract the secret key (with the probability of 95%), the aircrack-ptw software needs about 85,000 data packets. FYI, about 40,000 can be caught and processed in one minute, using the computational power of an ordinary Pentium at 1.7GHz.

 
The conclusion is simple – don't use WEP anymore. It's obsolete and insecure.

 
If you are interested, read more here.

 
Of course, we are not encouraging anybody to hack into a private network.    

 


 

 

Last modified on Friday, 06 April 2007 10:58

test1

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments