Featured Articles

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

The LG G Watch R, the first Android Wear watch with a truly round face, is coming soon and judging by…

More...
LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG has officially announced its first smartphone SoC, the NUCLUN, formerly known as the Odin.

More...
Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft has announced that it move 2.4 million consoles in fiscal year 2015 Q1. The announcement came with the latest financial…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 16 June 2008 08:00

Non-XE Bloomfields get slower memory support

Written by test

Image

Only DDR3-1066 for the masses


According to HKEPC, who has compiled a list of the three upcoming Nehalem-based Bloomfield processors, the 2.66 and 2.93GHz non-XE versions will only get support for DDR3 memory at 1,066MHz, while the XE model clocked at 3.2GHz will have support for 1,333MHz DDR3 memory.

The XE model also has a faster QPI interface at 6.4GT/s while the non-XE models are stuck at 4.8GT/s, but this information is in itself not news, as this has been common knowledge for some time.

We're not sure why Intel decided to do this segmentation, although it's not the first time Intel has limited certain technology to a specific chipset or CPU. However, this time we expected the entire range to have nearly the same feature set, but it appears Intel had other plans.

We're not sure how much of a performance impact this will have, nor do we know if the higher speeds can be reached with some overclocking to the slower models. These are questions that we're sure will be answered in due time, but for now it looks like those that want that extra bit of expected performance have to save up some extra cash to get it.

More here (in Chinese).

Last modified on Monday, 16 June 2008 10:18
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments