Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 16 June 2008 08:00

Non-XE Bloomfields get slower memory support

Written by test

Image

Only DDR3-1066 for the masses


According to HKEPC, who has compiled a list of the three upcoming Nehalem-based Bloomfield processors, the 2.66 and 2.93GHz non-XE versions will only get support for DDR3 memory at 1,066MHz, while the XE model clocked at 3.2GHz will have support for 1,333MHz DDR3 memory.

The XE model also has a faster QPI interface at 6.4GT/s while the non-XE models are stuck at 4.8GT/s, but this information is in itself not news, as this has been common knowledge for some time.

We're not sure why Intel decided to do this segmentation, although it's not the first time Intel has limited certain technology to a specific chipset or CPU. However, this time we expected the entire range to have nearly the same feature set, but it appears Intel had other plans.

We're not sure how much of a performance impact this will have, nor do we know if the higher speeds can be reached with some overclocking to the slower models. These are questions that we're sure will be answered in due time, but for now it looks like those that want that extra bit of expected performance have to save up some extra cash to get it.

More here (in Chinese).

Last modified on Monday, 16 June 2008 10:18
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments