Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 15 August 2007 10:53

AMD 6400+ Black Box performance

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic

Image

First review pops up

 
The guys at HKEPC Hardware got a hold of AMD's latest and last Athlon X2, the 6400+ black box.

AMD's new part, clocked at 3.2GHz, outperforms the 3GHz Athlon X2 6000+ by 2 to 7 per cent. Compared to Intel's 2.66GHz E6750 the results are mixed, and against the 3.0GHz E6850 it fails to impress.

The 90nm Windsor AMD uses 149W on full load, compared to 118W of the more powerful E6850.

Check out the results here.

 

 

Last modified on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 10:59
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments