Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 15 August 2007 10:53

AMD 6400+ Black Box performance

Written by Nermin Hajdarbegovic

Image

First review pops up

 
The guys at HKEPC Hardware got a hold of AMD's latest and last Athlon X2, the 6400+ black box.

AMD's new part, clocked at 3.2GHz, outperforms the 3GHz Athlon X2 6000+ by 2 to 7 per cent. Compared to Intel's 2.66GHz E6750 the results are mixed, and against the 3.0GHz E6850 it fails to impress.

The 90nm Windsor AMD uses 149W on full load, compared to 118W of the more powerful E6850.

Check out the results here.

 

 

Last modified on Wednesday, 15 August 2007 10:59
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments