Featured Articles

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel has been executing its tick tock strategy flawlessly since January 2006 and now there is some indication that we might…

More...
Xbox One demoed running GTX card

Xbox One demoed running GTX card

It looks like the Xbox One just cannot catch a break. We have stumbled upon a report claiming that Xbox One…

More...
Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell is out and now we have the complete specs for Intel’s first batch of fourth generation Core parts, as well…

More...
EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

Nvidia is hoping that the Geforce GTX 770 will be a very popular product, and EVGA obviously share this view, as…

More...
Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward has now officially unveiled its custom version of the Geforce GTX 770, the Gainward GTX 770 Phantom. Based on the…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 18 September 2007 08:03

TGIP wins patent infringement verdict

Written by David Stellmack
Image

Also wins Verizon settlement



AT&T Inc. lost a jury trial in a patent infringement case in U.S. District Court brought by TGIP, Inc. and as a result has been ordered by the Court to pay $156 million to TGIP. 

The case was based on two patents reportedly owned by TGIP that pertained to activation of telephone calling cards.  The jury also found that AT&T had “willfully” infringed upon TGIP’s patents, which means that the verdict is subject to “treble” (i.e., 3x the amount) damages, making the total verdict against AT&T worth $468 million.

AT&T announced that it would appeal the verdict.  The legal action was filed against AT&T Corporation in 2006 prior to its merger with SBC, when it became AT&T Inc.

Verizon Communications Inc. confirmed that it had settled out of court with TGIP, Inc. to avoid going to trial over allegations similar to those lodged against AT&T. The amount of the settlement and any other details were not available.

Last modified on Tuesday, 18 September 2007 10:10

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments