Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 04 September 2007 12:57

Brother print heads should be recalled

Written by

Image

Error 41

 

The print heads on Brother inkjet printers should have been recalled years ago according to a technician who spoke to the New Zealand Press.

A Google search on "Brother Error 41" is devoted to the world wide problem and how Brother is handling it. "Error 41" is the message that pops up on the printer's screen when there is a failure of the print head.

The unnamed technician said that the public should be warned as he was sick of hearing disgruntled customers complain of "error 41".

Brother inkjet printers were the least reliable of the five brands in its survey, including Hewlett Packard (HP), Canon and Epson.More than 10 per cent of Brothers had to be repaired.

Michael Smith, marketing manager for Brother International (NZ), admited that the rate of "error 41" was unacceptably high in a series of machines launched five years ago.

More here.


Last modified on Tuesday, 04 September 2007 12:58

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments