Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 03 September 2007 07:05

FCC rejects M2Z wireless Internet petition

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Rules that spectrum license request not in public interest


 

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has rejected an application by M2Z, a California-based venture that petitioned the FCC for a 15-year exclusive nationwide license to build and operate a “family friendly spectrum” in the 2155MHz-to-2175MHz spectrum band, a spectrum not currently being used.

M2Z petitioned for use of the spectrum in return for depositing part of its revenues with the U.S. Treasury. The petition was filed 16 months ago by M2Z, a start-up company founded by a former FCC wireless telecommunications bureau chief and a former NASA engineer and backed by several high-profile Silicon Valley VC firms.  M2Z pitched its application as bringing competition to the broadband market as a “free” wireless network that would operate in the public interest.

The free service, however, would have been supported by advertising and would actually require a consumer to purchase of an M2Z reception device (estimated retail of US$200) with a mandatory filtering system to block access to sites with obscene, indecent or pornographic material to receive the “free” wireless reception.

The wireless industry strongly objected to what it termed the privatization of public airwaves and said that the open airwaves should be auctioned off to provide a better long-term use for more public benefit.  The FCC agreed, indicating that it did not believe that one company should control a broad piece of the spectrum for such a long term without more consideration over how use of this spectrum could serve the public interest.

A coalition of public interest groups also raised concerns about M2Z’s network filters and how it was evaluating the material in lieu of U.S. Constitutional First Amendment concerns (guaranteeing individual rights to privacy). The coalition requested that the FCC impose Net neutrality requirements on that spectrum.

Read more here.

Last modified on Monday, 03 September 2007 10:51

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments