Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 10 October 2007 11:52

Where is Nvidia's 65nm $99 chip?

Written by Fuad Abazovic

Image

Missing in action


Nvidia is about to unleash its $199/249 D8,aka G92, and it will introduce the G98 aka. D8M in the entry level market but we noticed one big gap in its product roadmap.

Nvidia doesn't have a $99 solution done in 65 nanometre it this might indicate that something went wrong with such a product.

Nvidia has $199 part and $55 part but there is not anything to fit the so called sweet spot. ATI already has 65nanometre in production for a few months now and a 55 nanometre part is on the way. We will try to find out what went wrong here but it doesn't look good for Nvidia.   

Last modified on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 12:26
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments