Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 17 May 2010 11:59

Apple leaned on the coppers to raid Gizmodo

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Fear the fruit


It looks
like it was Apple that twisted the arms of coppers to get the house of Gizmodo editor raided. According to documents that were unsealed over the weekend, Apple attorney George Riley told detectives that the publication of evidence of the device by Gizmodo was immensely damaging.

He said that people that would have otherwise purchased a currently existing Apple product would wait for the next item to be released, thereby hurting overall sales and negatively effecting Apple's earnings.

However since the article had been published, it was not going to resolve the situation by arresting anyone. At that point it had the iPhone prototype back, although Gizmodo might have made a bit of legal mistake of asking Apple to prove that it was its prototype before handing it over.

Apple CEO Steve Jobs personally contacted Gizmodo editor Brian Lam to request the 4G phone's return on April 19, the day the story was published, but Lam refused to do so, unless the company provided "confirmation that it is real, from Apple, officially.”

It is clear from the documents that pressure was coming from Apple to do a raid and its laywers were screaming that a “crime” had been committed. In fact it seems more that Apple wanted to send a message to the tame IT press that it had to tow the line or it would use its influence.

It will be interesting to see if a higher court over turns the search warrant as illegal.


Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments