Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC’s next generation 16nm process has reached an important milestone – 16nm FinFET Plus (16FF+) is now in risk production.

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:09

Greenpeace bashes Facebook over data center plans

Written by


Image

Wants it to use 100% renewable energy


Greenpeace
has started a campaign against Facebook demanding that the social networking site switches to 100 percent renewable energy. Greenpeace communists launched the campaign in response to Facebook's plans to build a custom data center in Oregon.

Now you might think that the new data center will be powered by freshly squeezed polar bear fat, but it won't. It will run on energy provided by coal power plants, which are still the dominant power source around the globe. However, Facebook claims that the plans were originally drawn up to use hydro power, but the Bonneville Power Administration chose to sell hydro power to an aluminium plant. The fact that aluminium production is one of the most energy costly processes known to man doesn't seem to bother Greenpeace too much. Tree huggers aren't too thrilled with the hydro power idea either, as it makes life miserable for salmon and the bears that eat them, as well as manbearpig.

Gartner VP Rakes Kumar says Greenpeace's position is idealistic, and that's putting it mildly. "I think Greenpeace’s position is admirable but not realistic at the moment," said Kumar. Green IT expert Greg Shulz believes Greenpeace's criticism is misdirected. “Why is Greenpeace calling out Facebook and ignoring Google? The poster child for inefficiency is Google. Facebook requires less resources per pages displayed.”

Mind you, although it might be a power hog, Google is useful. Unlike Facebook, it does something.

More here.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments