Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 16 March 2010 12:09

Greenpeace bashes Facebook over data center plans

Written by


Image

Wants it to use 100% renewable energy


Greenpeace
has started a campaign against Facebook demanding that the social networking site switches to 100 percent renewable energy. Greenpeace communists launched the campaign in response to Facebook's plans to build a custom data center in Oregon.

Now you might think that the new data center will be powered by freshly squeezed polar bear fat, but it won't. It will run on energy provided by coal power plants, which are still the dominant power source around the globe. However, Facebook claims that the plans were originally drawn up to use hydro power, but the Bonneville Power Administration chose to sell hydro power to an aluminium plant. The fact that aluminium production is one of the most energy costly processes known to man doesn't seem to bother Greenpeace too much. Tree huggers aren't too thrilled with the hydro power idea either, as it makes life miserable for salmon and the bears that eat them, as well as manbearpig.

Gartner VP Rakes Kumar says Greenpeace's position is idealistic, and that's putting it mildly. "I think Greenpeace’s position is admirable but not realistic at the moment," said Kumar. Green IT expert Greg Shulz believes Greenpeace's criticism is misdirected. “Why is Greenpeace calling out Facebook and ignoring Google? The poster child for inefficiency is Google. Facebook requires less resources per pages displayed.”

Mind you, although it might be a power hog, Google is useful. Unlike Facebook, it does something.

More here.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments