Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 16 November 2009 11:30

Apple wins Psystar case

Written by Nick Farell

Image

We are the only Apple company in the village


Apple has
won the case against Psystar, which has been selling Mac clones running Mac OS X.

U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup granted Apple's request for a summary judgement, while denying Psystar's counterclaim. He said that Psystar has violated Apple's exclusive reproduction right, distribution right, and right to create derivative works.

Apple sued in July 2008, a few months after Psystar began selling Mac clones. Psystar's claimed it could run Apple's Mac OS X operating system on non-Apple machines. Apple denied this, stating that its Mac OS X end user license agreement allows people to install the OS on Apple computers only.

Both Apple and Psystar had a requested a summary judgment, which is a determination made without trial based on the merits of a case. The judge rejected Psystar could claim fair use because it did not even attempt to address the four factors used to determine fair use.

Psystar's could not claim "first sale" doctrine, which allows someone who buys copyrighted material to sell it. Alsup said this doctrine did not apply to the "unauthorized copies" that Psystar produced. Psystar violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act because it circumvented Apple's protection barrier, the judge added.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments