Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 16 November 2009 11:30

Apple wins Psystar case

Written by Nick Farell

Image

We are the only Apple company in the village


Apple has
won the case against Psystar, which has been selling Mac clones running Mac OS X.

U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup granted Apple's request for a summary judgement, while denying Psystar's counterclaim. He said that Psystar has violated Apple's exclusive reproduction right, distribution right, and right to create derivative works.

Apple sued in July 2008, a few months after Psystar began selling Mac clones. Psystar's claimed it could run Apple's Mac OS X operating system on non-Apple machines. Apple denied this, stating that its Mac OS X end user license agreement allows people to install the OS on Apple computers only.

Both Apple and Psystar had a requested a summary judgment, which is a determination made without trial based on the merits of a case. The judge rejected Psystar could claim fair use because it did not even attempt to address the four factors used to determine fair use.

Psystar's could not claim "first sale" doctrine, which allows someone who buys copyrighted material to sell it. Alsup said this doctrine did not apply to the "unauthorized copies" that Psystar produced. Psystar violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act because it circumvented Apple's protection barrier, the judge added.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments