Featured Articles

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

5th Generation Broadwell 14nm family comes in three lines

Intel's 5th Core processor family, codenamed Broadwell, will launch in three lines for the mobile segment. We are talking about upcoming…

More...
Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Broadwell Chromebooks coming in late Q1 2015

Google's Chromebook OS should be updating automatically every six weeks, but Intel doesn't come close with its hardware refresh schedule.

More...
New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

New round of Nexus phone rumour kicks off

Rumours involving upcoming Nexus devices are nothing uncommon, but this year there is a fair bit of confusion, especially on the…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 31 July 2009 11:56

DRM content is not forever

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Music and film industry says


If you
buy anything with DRM protection you should not expect to ever own it, according to a top lawyer who represents the MPAA, RIAA Steven Metalitz in a letter to the legal advisor at the Copyright Office, said that that copyright owners and their licensees are currently required to provide consumers with perpetual access to creative works.

However no other product or service providers are held to such “lofty standards”, Metalitz said. No one expects computers or other electronics devices to work properly in perpetuity, and there is no reason that any particular mode of distributing copyrighted works should be required to do so either.

The Music and Film industry is worried because the content they shipped with DRM only seems to work for a few years because they cannot maintain authentication servers. Apparently users who bought the content for full price will not get the same amount of use out of them because the music and film industry insisted they buy it with there DRM installed.

Of course Metalitz is not quite right either. You can still play music on LPs and even Cylinders if you have the right gear. Most people would be able to live with DRM if there was a legal requirement for it to work on original equipment for 70 to 100 years. However it seems that the Music and Film Industry's motivation for DRM was not to protect themselves from pirates, but to force punters to keep buying the same tracks over many years.

The biggest threat appears to be, not the pirate, but those people who have record collections and want to keep them.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments