Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 19 June 2009 13:46

Intel's Dispute Finder keeps your news FUD free

Written by


Image

Takes the fun out of browsing


Intel boffins have come up with a new tool for keeping online content FUD free, by highlighting disputed portions of text displayed in your browser.

Dubbed Dispute Finder, the open source Firefox plug-in automatically highlights text marked by other users as inaccurate or disputed. Basically when you come across some info that doesn't sit well with you, you can highlight it and report it, and obviously you have to put in some arguments too, which will be an instant turn off for most forum trolls and Wikipedia know-it-alls.

Once you've done that, it's up to other readers to vote your dispute up or down, rate your sources for accuracy and, of course, add their own sources and arguments. It all sounds quite interesting, but there's a chance a two paragraph filler will end up the size of a cheap paperback love novel once people are done with the discussion. Also, there's always a chance the dispute, although correct, might be voted down simply because it offends people or isn't shared by the majority of readers who come across it.

Without the regular dose of sarcasm, with proper abuse safeguards and further development, this really could turn out to be pretty interesting concept.

If you want to try it out, you can find it here. (Just don't try it out on Fudzilla. sub.ed.)

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments