Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 19 June 2009 13:46

Intel's Dispute Finder keeps your news FUD free

Written by


Image

Takes the fun out of browsing


Intel boffins have come up with a new tool for keeping online content FUD free, by highlighting disputed portions of text displayed in your browser.

Dubbed Dispute Finder, the open source Firefox plug-in automatically highlights text marked by other users as inaccurate or disputed. Basically when you come across some info that doesn't sit well with you, you can highlight it and report it, and obviously you have to put in some arguments too, which will be an instant turn off for most forum trolls and Wikipedia know-it-alls.

Once you've done that, it's up to other readers to vote your dispute up or down, rate your sources for accuracy and, of course, add their own sources and arguments. It all sounds quite interesting, but there's a chance a two paragraph filler will end up the size of a cheap paperback love novel once people are done with the discussion. Also, there's always a chance the dispute, although correct, might be voted down simply because it offends people or isn't shared by the majority of readers who come across it.

Without the regular dose of sarcasm, with proper abuse safeguards and further development, this really could turn out to be pretty interesting concept.

If you want to try it out, you can find it here. (Just don't try it out on Fudzilla. sub.ed.)

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments