Featured Articles

IDC says PC market is rebounding

IDC says PC market is rebounding

Research firm IDC has published its latest report into the state of the PC market and while there are some signs…

More...
TSMC steps up development of 10nm process

TSMC steps up development of 10nm process

TSMC, the world’s biggest chip foundry for hire, has reportedly stepped up development of its 10nm manufacturing process.

More...
Broadwell 14nm desktop comes late in Q2 2015

Broadwell 14nm desktop comes late in Q2 2015

A while ago we mentioned that Broadwell won’t show up in the desktop space this year and we got it right.…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
EVGA GTX 780 Classified reviewed

EVGA GTX 780 Classified reviewed

The EVGA GTX 780 Classified has been dethroned as the company’s fastest non-Titan card following the introduction of the GTX 780…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 26 May 2009 11:37

Quantum computers may not be the answer

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Put the cat back in the box

 

Top boffins who have been looking under the bonnet of Quantum computers are starting to think that they may not be the future of computing. According to Physorg, David Gross at the Institute for Mathematical Physics in Braunschweig, Germany, has just done a paper in which he states that most quantum states are too entangled to be any use as a computer.

Until now the boffins had been thinking that the more entanglement they had, the more powerful quantum computing will be. However he has worked out that there can be such a thing as too much entanglement, rendering the quantum information processing attempt useless.

In a complex explanation, which failed to mention any cats who may or may not be alive, Gross said that entanglement introduces a certain randomness into the system. As this goes up, the computer is about as accurate as me using a slide rule.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments