Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:24

Swapping files is fair use

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Top lawyer claims


In a
move that will set a chill in the music and film industry's bones one of the US's top lawyers is set to take them to the cleaners claiming that file sharing on P2P networks is fair use.

For years the music and film industry avoided taking on Harvard students for file sharing, fearing that there were people there who could give them a run for their money because they would know the law. Now a top law professor Charles Nesson has revealed he will be defending a student against the RIAA by claiming that there is noting illegal about swapping files provided you don't make any money on the transaction.

Nesson is defending file-swapper Joel Tenenbaum and in court filings, revealed a doomsday strategy for the film and music business. If he wins, he will essentially legalize the sharing of all digital goods, copyrighted or not, by noncommercial users. He will argue that statutory damages only apply to commercial infringers.  The law offers rightsholders the chance to seek either statutory or actual damages, but that the two are meant to be equivalent.

If the two remedies are equivalent, and if "individual noncommercial copying results in no provable actual harm to the copyright harm holder," then actual damages would be zero-and so would statutory damages.

Fair use is defined by four factors and Nesson is confident he can give a jury evidence relating to each one. Another one of his defences is that the jury should consider "the copyright holder's knowledge of and assumption of risk when it published the copyrighted work that work would be ripped and shared on P2P networks."
Last modified on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 11:29

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments