Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 22 June 2007 10:44

Microsoft lousy at patching Vista

Written by

Image

XP did much better


Six months after shipping Windows Vista, there are more publicly disclosed Vista bugs unpatched than Microsoft had with Windows XP.

This would seem to indicate that Microsoft's patching process on newly released software has slid since XP's release.

According to IDG, the Microsoft security executive released data Thursday showing that out of 27 disclosed Vista vulnerabilities in the six months after it first shipped last November only 12 have been patched. During XP's first six months, Microsoft managed to fix 36 out of 39 known bugs.

Microsoft's security strategy director Jeff Jones, a Microsoft, said that overall, Vista was doing better than XP because it has fewer total and fewer high-severity vulnerabilities at the six month mark compared to its predecessor product, Windows XP.

It is just they can't fix the ones they find.

More here.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments