Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 25 September 2008 10:11

Landmark file-sharing case gets a retrial

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Judge admits error


A federal judge
has admitted he cocked up instructing the jury on a landmark P2P case and ordered a retrial.

Jammie Thomas was convicted last October and a jury in Duluth found her guilty of copyright infringement for offering to share 24 songs on the Kazaa file sharing network. She was ordered to pay $222,000 to six record companies. U.S. District Judge Michael Davis granted her motion for a new trial, while also imploring Congress to change copyright laws to prevent excessive awards in similar cases.

The case centered on whether record companies had to prove anyone else actually downloaded their copyrighted songs or whether it was enough to argue that she made copyrighted music available for copying. Davis concluded in his 44-page ruling Wednesday that the law requires that actual distribution be shown. When he instructed the jury he told them it didn't.

Davis wrote that he didn't discount the industry's claim that illegal downloading has hurt the recording business, but called the award "wholly disproportionate" to the plaintiff's damages. Even if Thomas is found guilty she will have infringed on the copyrights of 24 songs, which he said was the equivalent of around three CDs that would cost less than $54. The total award was more than 4,000 times the cost of three CDs.

He added that damages that are more than 100 times the costs of the works would serve as a "sufficient deterrent" to illegal downloading.  By using Kazaa, Thomas acted like countless other Internet users and her alleged acts were illegal, but common. Her status as a consumer who was not seeking to harm her competitors or make a profit does not excuse her behavior. But it does make the award of hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages unprecedented and oppressive, he wrote.
Last modified on Friday, 26 September 2008 04:00

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments