Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 20 August 2008 07:30

M.I.T. students 1, MBTA 0

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Judge rules in favor of students

In a victory for academic freedom, the presiding judge in the Massachusetts Bay Rapid Transit Authority case vs. the M.I.T. students has ruled that the three M.I.T. student defendants that were previously under a gag order are now free to publicly discuss their findings.

We have been reporting this story since it broke and this is the latest event in the saga. The three students had prepared a paper for a classroom project at M.I.T. which showed how the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority automated ticketing system could be circumvented.

They had planned to present the paper at a conference, but the MBTA took the students to court and won a temporary injunction on the grounds that the presentation violated U.S. laws on computer fraud.

The federal court ruled that presenting an academic paper does not violate computer fraud laws. The ACLU lauded the decision. "We need academic freedom and an ability to talk about these things, without fearing legal consequences," said Carol Rose, Executive Director of the ACLU of Massachusetts. "The marketplace of ideas does not work when we have gag orders imposed on our scientists," she added.

Now that the judge has granted the students the ability to discuss their findings the MBTA invited the students again to sit down and discuss their findings with the MBTA.

Last modified on Wednesday, 20 August 2008 15:00

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments