Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 25 August 2014 13:12

China not as autocratic as we thought

Written by Nick Farrell

y censorship banned 

US hackers surprised by censorship standards

Researchers from Harvard and the University of California San Diego released a report in Science in which they explain how to get past the Great Firewall of China.

Gary King and his team created dozens of shill accounts and posted hundreds of messages on China's most popular social networks to see what would be filtered. Then they worked out a way of gaining access to the software used to censor content, so it could reverse-engineer the system.

The group created its own social media website, purchased a URL, rented server space, contracted with one of the most popular software platforms in China used to create these sites, submitted, automatically reviewed, posted, and censored its own submissions.

As a result they had complete access to the software, documentation, help forums, and extensive consultation with support staff and could get recommendations on how to conduct censorship on our own site in compliance with government standards.

What surprised King was that it was OK to criticize the government in China, as long as you are not inciting others to do anything about it.

It looks like the country is more worried about uprisings, protests, and anything that could spur real-life action, not government criticism.

While China is autocratic, King says that it's a "responsive" autocracy, meaning the government is cool with people criticizing their local leaders. In fact, it actually serves the government well if they do so.

Basically if you use a word like “masses," "incident," "terror," "go on the streets," and "demonstration" you are going to be flagged by the censors.

But what is clever about the Chinese censorship system is that it encourages social networking sites to do the censoring for it.

China can maintain the illusion of not censoring posts if it's implemented on a slightly different basis by hundreds of companies throughout the country. At the same time, companies know that they have to censor content that incites people to action, allowing the Chinese government to keep people held down without the illusion that it's actually doing so.

 

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments