Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 29 July 2008 07:22

Comcast violated FCC regulations

Written by David Stellmack


Image

FCC expected to rule


According to a post in The Wall Street Journal, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will announce by the end of this week that Comcast Corporation acted improperly when it slowed down and impeded some of its customers’ Internet traffic. 

If the FCC issues this ruling, it means a decision by the FCC that Comcast violated Federal policy by interfering with file sharing services such as BitTorrent, by preventing some of its Internet customers from sharing online videos.  While Comcast has admitted slowing traffic, it has not admitted that it did so to intentionally interfere with its customers’ Internet file sharing.

An FCC ruling against Comcast spells a victory for consumer groups and high-tech companies that have fought to keep Internet Web traffic free from interference by ISPs and anyone else that is not a Web user. Cable and telephone providers have been experimenting with ways to limit bandwidth use by some customers in the form of “Internet metering,” which means they plan to charge those customers a premium for and/or to limit for the amount of bandwidth customers can use. 

Consumer and file sharing groups have long argued that the real issue is not the amount of bandwidth, but rather the content that the ISPs and cable providers are attempting to control, and consumers are incensed about this, particularly when they are paying for that access.

If the FCC rules against Comcast, it is likely that Comcast will drag its feet by appealing in court. However, the wheels of justice do move, albeit slowly. FCC Chairman Kevin Martin has already issued a statement that he believes all consumers should have "unfettered access to the Internet."

The expected FCC ruling will mandate that Comcast cease blocking or slowing Internet traffic and that it must disclose its practices to its customers. While Comcast may appeal and delay, the expected pending FCC ruling will also force other Internet providers to keep their practices in line, as well.

The FCC ruled in 2005 that customers have the right to use the content, lawful applications, and devices they wish on the networks they use, known as Net Neutrality. We welcome enforcement of Net Neutrality. It’s overdue from Comcast.

Last modified on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 07:37

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments